210  
FXUS10 KWNH 101709  
PMDHMD  
 
MODEL DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION  
NWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD  
109 PM EDT SAT AUG 10 2019  
 
VALID AUG 10/1200 UTC THRU AUG 14/0000 UTC  
 
...SEE NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) FOR THE STATUS OF THE UPPER AIR  
INGEST...  
 
12Z INITIAL MODEL EVALUATION WITH PREFERENCES AND CONFIDENCE  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
   
..OVERALL PATTERN ACROSS THE CONUS
 
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
PREFERENCE: GENERAL MODEL BLEND, WITH LESS WEIGHT ON THE 00Z CMC  
AND 12Z NAM  
CONFIDENCE: AVERAGE, SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE BY DAY 3  
 
OVERALL THE MODELS ARE IN FAIRLY DECENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF MASS  
FIELDS AS THE MORE AMPLIFIED TROUGH/RIDGE PATTERN BEGINS TO ERODE  
INTO ZONAL FLOW BY MID-WEEK. MODELS DO HOWEVER START TO DIVERGE A  
BIT BY DAY 3 WITH THE MID-LEVEL ENERGY AND ENERGY NORTH INTO THE  
CANADIAN PROVINCES.  
 
THE BIGGEST DIFFERENCES NOTED WERE WITH RESPECT TO MID-LEVEL  
ENERGY RIDING BETWEEN THE APPROACHING TROUGH IN THE WEST AND THE  
AMPLIFIED RIDGE ACROSS THE CENTRAL CONUS. THE POSITIONING OF THIS  
ACTIVITY WILL HAVE LARGE IMPLICATIONS WITH RESPECT TO QPF. AS  
THESE MID-LEVEL WAVES MOVE AROUND THE NORTHERN TIER OF THE RIDGE,  
THE LOWERING HEIGHTS WILL EVENTUALLY DEAMPLIFY THE RIDGE IN THE  
PLAINS WITH TIME. THE TROUGH AXIS ACROSS THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST IS  
SLIGHTLY FASTER WITH THE 00Z CMC WHICH HAS AN IMPACT ON THE  
SHORTWAVE ACTIVITY MOVING ACROSS NORTHERN MONTANA TOWARD THE GREAT  
LAKES THROUGH DAY 2 AND INTO THE NORTHEAST BY DAY 3. GIVEN THESE  
DIFFERENCES ARE FARTHER FROM THE ENSEMBLE CLUSTERING, FELT LESSER  
WEIGHT SHOULD BE PUT ON THIS MODEL OVERALL.  
 
THE 12 NAM IS ALSO SHOWING SUBTLE DIFFERENCES WITH ITS MID-LEVEL  
WAVE TRACKING ACROSS THE CENTRAL US TOWARD THE GREAT LAKES. THE  
MODEL ILLUSTRATES THIS ACTIVITY LOWERING THE MID-LEVEL HEIGHTS AND  
THUS FLATTENING THE RIDGE MORE QUICKLY THAN THE OTHER MODEL  
GUIDANCE. IN ADDITION, THE IMPULSE TRACKS TOO FAR NORTH BY DAY 3  
ACROSS THE GREAT LAKES INTO THE NORTHEAST LIKELY DUE TO A  
FLATTER/LESS AMPLIFIED TROUGH/CLOSED LOW ACROSS QUEBEC.  
 
BASED ON THE 00Z CMC AND 12Z NAM DIFFERENCES, FEEL THESE TWO  
PIECES OF GUIDANCE SHOULD HAVE LESS WEIGHT WITHIN THE MODEL BLEND.  
THIS IS ALSO SUPPORTED BY THE QPF VARIABILITY NOTED AMONG THE  
MODELS AS WELL.  
 
MODEL TRENDS AT WWW.WPC.NOAA.GOV/HTML/MODEL2.HTML  
500 MB FORECASTS AT WWW.WPC.NOAA.GOV/H5PREF/H5PREF.SHTML  
 
PAGANO  
 

 
 
CLICK HERE TO GO TO PREVIOUS BULLETINS.

The Nexlab HPC Page Main Text Page