853  
FXUS10 KWNH 061645  
PMDHMD  
 
MODEL DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION  
NWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD  
1245 PM EDT MON APR 06 2020  
 
VALID APR 06/1200 UTC THRU APR 10/0000 UTC  
 
...SEE NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) FOR THE STATUS OF THE UPPER AIR  
INGEST...  
 
12Z MODEL EVALUATION WITH INITIAL PREFERENCES AND CONFIDENCE  
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
SLOW MOVING SOUTHERN STREAM CLOSED LOW.  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
PREFERENCE: GENERAL MODEL THROUGH 08.12Z; NON-GFS, NON-NAM BLEND  
FOR DAY 3  
CONFIDENCE: SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERAGE  
 
ANOMALOUS UPPER LEVEL CLOSED LOW CURRENTLY CENTERED OFF THE  
CALIFORNIA COAST WILL DROP TO THE SOUTH OVER THE NEXT COUPLE OF  
DAYS BEFORE MOVING INLAND TOWARD THE FOUR CORNERS REGION BY THE  
END OF DAY 3. THROUGH 48 HOURS (08.12Z) THERE IS VERY GOOD  
AGREEMENT IN THE UPPER LEVEL PATTERN IN THE LATEST DETERMINISTIC  
GUIDANCE. BEYOND THAT TIME FRAME, THERE REMAINS SOME PROGRESSION  
ISSUES BETWEEN THE NCEP GUIDANCE (GFS/NAM) AND NON-NCEP  
(UKMET/CMC/ECMWF). THE LATEST 12Z GFS AND NAM ARE FASTER TO PULL  
THE SYSTEM EASTWARD, OPENING UP AS THERE APPEARS TO BE MORE  
INTERACTION WITH THE DIGGING NORTHERN STREAM ENERGY OVER THE  
PLAINS AND GREAT LAKES. MEANWHILE, THE ECMWF/CMC/UKMET OFFER A  
SLOWER SOLUTION, MORE SEPARATED FROM THE NORTHERN STREAM ENERGY.  
THE SLOWER PROGRESSION REMAINS FAVORED, AS IT APPEARS THE  
DETERMINISTIC GFS AND NAM ARE TOO FAST. LOOKING AT THE ENSEMBLES,  
THE 06Z GEFS MEAN, WHILE STILL FASTER THAN THE 00Z ECMWF, IS MUCH  
SLOWER THAN THE DETERMINISTIC 12Z GFS. THE ECENS ALSO OFFERS A  
SLOWER SOLUTION, AND IS NEARLY IDENTICAL TO ITS DETERMINISTIC RUN.  
SO, FOR THIS SYSTEM, A GENERAL MODEL BLEND IS FAVORED FOR DAY 1/2,  
FOLLOWED BY NON-GFS, NON-NAM BLEND FOR DAY 3.  
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
UPPER TROUGH DIGGING ACROSS GREAT LAKES; SURFACE LOW DEVELOPING  
OFF NEW ENGLAND COAST DAY 3  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
PREFERENCE: GENERAL MODEL BLEND THROUGH 08.12Z; ECMWF/ECENS/GFS  
BLEND DAY 3  
CONFIDENCE: AVERAGE (SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE NEW ENGLAND DAY 3)  
 
SHORTWAVE ENERGY MOVING THROUGH SOUTHERN CANADA IS EXPECTED TO  
CLOSE OFF AS IT APPROACHES THE GREAT LAKES REGION. AS THE TROUGH  
DIGS OVER THE EASTERN GREAT LAKES, A SECONDARY SURFACE LOW IS  
FORECAST TO DEVELOP OFFSHORE THE NORTHEAST/NEW ENGLAND COAST  
BEFORE RAPIDLY DEEPENING AS IT MOVES NORTHEAST. OVERALL THIS IS A  
LOW CONFIDENCE FORECAST FOR DAY 3 AS SPECIFIC TIMING IS IMPORTANT  
FOR HOW CLOSE THE LOW SPAWNS NEAR THE COAST AND ITS SENSIBLE  
WEATHER IMPACTS. FOR MASS FIELDS PURPOSES, THE ECMWF AND ITS ECENS  
MEAN HAS SHOWN THE BEST CONSISTENCY FOR THE DAY 2/3 TIME FRAME BUT  
THE LATEST 12Z GFS DOES OFFER SOME UTILITY BUT ITS SURFACE LOW IS  
ABOUT ~15 MB WEAKER THAN THE 00Z ECMWF BUT WITH RELATIVELY SIMILAR  
POSITIONS. OVERALL, IT'S A LOW CONFIDENCE FORECAST BUT A BLEND  
FAVORING THE ECMWF/ECENS WITH SOME GFS (AND NAM THERMALLY) WOULD  
BE APPROPRIATE FOR THE NORTHEAST/NEW ENGLAND ON DAY 3.  
 
MODEL TRENDS AT WWW.WPC.NCEP.NOAA.GOV/HTML/MODEL2.SHTML  
500 MB FORECASTS AT WWW.WPC.NCEP.NOAA.GOV/H5PREF/H5PREF.SHTML  
 
TAYLOR  
 
 
CLICK HERE TO GO TO PREVIOUS BULLETINS.
The Nexlab HPC Page
Main Text Page