507  
FXUS10 KWNH 190444  
PMDHMD  
 
MODEL DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION  
NWS WEATHER PREDICTION CENTER COLLEGE PARK MD  
1243 AM EDT SUN APR 19 2020  
 
VALID APR 19/0000 UTC THRU APR 22/1200 UTC  
 
...SEE NOUS42 KWNO (ADMNFD) FOR THE STATUS OF THE UPPER AIR  
INGEST...  
 
00Z NAM/GFS EVALUATION WITH PRELIMINARY PREFERENCES AND CONFIDENCE  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
   
..TRACK OF THE SOUTHERN STREAM SHORT WAVE  
 
...SURFACE LOW TRACKING ACROSS THE DEEP SOUTH TO THE MID ATLANTIC  
COAST...  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
PREFERENCE: GENERAL MODEL BLEND THROUGH 21/00Z, 00Z GFS/12Z  
NAM/12Z CMC THEREAFTER  
CONFIDENCE: AVERAGE  
 
THE 00Z NAM/GFS ARE CLOSE TO THE CONSENSUS TAKING SHORT WAVE  
ENERGY FROM NM ACROSS THE ARKLATEX TO THE DEEP SOUTH THROUGH  
20/00Z. IN FACT, MUCH OF THE 00Z/12Z GUIDANCE IS CLOSE WITH THIS  
FEATURE AND SURFACE LOW DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE MID ATLANTIC COAST  
THROUGH 20/12Z. THE SURFACE LOW TRACKS ARE ABOUT THE SAME, SO THE  
MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE MODELS REMAINS THE PLACEMENT OF THE  
AXIS OF HIGHEST RAINFALL, WHICH HAS MORE TO DO WITH MESOSCALE  
INTERACTIONS AND THE OVERLAY OF THE INSTABILITY AND MID LEVEL  
LIFT.  
 
THE 12Z ECMWF/UKMET BECOME SLOWER AND LEFT OF THE CONSENSUS WITH  
THE SURFACE LOW AFTER 21/00Z, LIKELY DUE TO THE SLOWER SHORT WAVE  
ENERGY IN THE DEVELOPING TROUGH. BECAUSE OF THIS, THESE MODELS  
WERE LEFT OUT OF THE PREFERRED BLEND BEYOND THAT TIME. BECAUSE OF  
THE DIFFERENCES WITH THE QPF PLACEMENT AND THE TRACK OF THE  
SURFACE LOW OFF THE COAST, FORECAST CONFIDENCE REMAINS AVERAGE.  
 
...SHORT WAVE ENERGY TRACKING ACROSS CENTRAL CANADA INTO THE UPPER  
GREAT LAKES...   
..DEVELOPING LONG WAVE TROUGH HEADED FOR NEW ENGLAND  
 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
PREFERENCE: GENERAL MODE BLEND THROUGH 21/12Z, 00Z GFS/12Z ECMWF  
AFTER THAT  
CONFIDENCE: SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERAGE THROUGH 21/12Z, SLIGHTLY BELOW  
AVERAGE AFTER THAT  
 
THE 00Z GFS/NAM ARE CLOSE TO THE CONSENSUS TRACKING SHORT WAVE  
ENERGY IN THE VERY FAST MID LEVEL FLOW FROM MANITOBA ACROSS THE  
UPPER GREAT LAKES THROUGH 21/12Z. BEYOND THAT TIME, THE 00Z NAM  
BECOMES SLOWER WITH THE DEVELOPING LONG WAVE TROUGH (WHICH TAKES  
ON A NEGATIVE TILT) APPROACHING NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND. THE 12Z  
UKMET/CMC APPEAR TO HAVE THE SAME ISSUE, WHILE THE 00Z GFS/12Z  
ECMWF ARE CLOSER WITH THE LONG WAVE TROUGH AND THE SURFACE LOW  
THAT STARTS DEEPENING OVER QUEBEC TOWARD THE END OF THE PERIOD.  
 
SINCE THE GFS/ECMWF HAVE THE SUPPORT OF THEIR ENSEMBLE MEANS,  
THESE SOLUTIONS COMPRISE THE PREFERRED BLEND. HOWEVER, DUE TO THE  
SPREAD CONCERNING THE EVOLUTION OF THE DEVELOPING LONG WAVE  
TROUGH, FORECAST CONFIDENCE DROPS TO SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE TOWARD  
THE END OF THE PERIOD.  
 
...DEVELOPING LONG WAVE TROUGH OVER THE SOUTHWEST AND ROCKIES  
MON/TUE  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
PREFERENCE: 00Z NAM/12Z ECMWF/12Z UKMET BLEND  
CONFIDENCE: SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE  
 
THE 00Z NAM/GFS ARE CLOSE TO THE MODEL CONSENSUS DROPPING A  
POSITIVELY TILTED LONG WAVE TROUGH FROM THE PACIFIC NORTHWEST  
ACROSS THE NORTHERN ROCKIES BEFORE 20/00Z. IN THE WAKE OF THIS  
SHORT WAVE, MID LEVEL RIDGING DEVELOPS FROM CENTRAL CA INTO THE  
PACIFIC NORTHWEST, PEAKING BEFORE 20/12Z BEFORE ERODING AHEAD OF  
THE NEXT SHORT WAVE IN THE FLOW.  
 
THE COLLAPSING MID LEVEL RIDGE IS RESULTING IN SOME MODEL  
INSTABILITY CONCERNING HOW QUICKLY THE NEXT SHORT WAVE CROSSES THE  
CA COAST BEFORE CLOSING OFF IN THE MID LEVELS OVER SOUTHERN NV BY  
21/00Z. THE TIMING ISSUES SUGGEST THAT THE 00Z GFS MAY BE TOO  
QUICK TO OPEN UP THE MID LEVEL CLOSED LOW INTO A LONG WAVE TROUGH  
CROSSING THE SOUTHERN ROCKIES BY 22/12Z. IN CONTRAST, THE 00Z  
NAM/12Z ECMWF/12Z UKMET INDICATED A SLOWER MOVEMENT, WHICH TRACKS  
BETTER WITH A MID LEVEL CLOSED LOW OPENING UP AND MOVING EAST.  
 
HOWEVER, THE DETAILS OF HOW THESE MODELS GET TO THE FINAL  
SOLUTIONS MAY YET STILL CHANGE, CONSIDERING HOW MUCH SPREAD THERE  
IS IN THE EVOLUTION OF THE CLOSED MID LEVEL SYSTEM. DUE TO THAT  
SPREAD, FORECAST CONFIDENCE IS SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERAGE.  
 
MODEL TRENDS AT WWW.WPC.NCEP.NOAA.GOV/HTML/MODEL2.SHTML  
500 MB FORECASTS AT WWW.WPC.NCEP.NOAA.GOV/H5PREF/H5PREF.SHTML  
 
HAYES  
 
 
CLICK HERE TO GO TO PREVIOUS BULLETINS.
The Nexlab HPC Page
Main Text Page